文章详情

案例背景

假设我们正在面试一位计算机专业毕业生,他在面试过程中遇到了

:在一个在线购物平台的订单处理系统中,当用户提交订单后,系统会自动生成一个订单号。用户反馈,在提交订单后,系统生成的订单号存在重复现象。

分析

我们需要分析导致订单号重复的原因。是可能的原因:

1. 订单号生成算法缺陷:可能是订单号生成算法存在导致在短时间内生成了重复的订单号。

2. 数据库事务处理:在订单号生成和订单信息插入数据库的过程中,可能存在并发控制导致数据不一致。

3. 系统负载:在高并况下,系统处理速度可能跟不上订单生成速度,导致订单号重复。

解答

我们将针对以上可能的原因,给出相应的解决方案。

1. 订单号生成算法缺陷

解决方案:修改订单号生成算法,确保每个订单号是唯一的。可以使用雪花算法(Snowflake Algorithm)或者UUID(Universally Unique Identifier)来生成订单号。

代码示例

java

public class OrderNumberGenerator {

private long workerId;

private long datacenterId;

private long sequence = 0L;

private long twepoch = 1288834974657L;

private long workerIdBits = 5L;

private long datacenterIdBits = 5L;

private long maxWorkerId = -1L ^ (-1L << workerIdBits);

private long maxDatacenterId = -1L ^ (-1L << datacenterIdBits);

private long sequenceBits = 12L;

private long workerIdShift = sequenceBits;

private long datacenterIdShift = sequenceBits + workerIdBits;

private long timestampLeftShift = sequenceBits + workerIdBits + datacenterIdBits;

private long sequenceMask = -1L ^ (-1L << sequenceBits);

private long lastTimestamp = -1L;

public OrderNumberGenerator(long workerId, long datacenterId) {

if (workerId > maxWorkerId || workerId < 0) {

throw new IllegalArgumentException(String.format("worker Id can't be greater than %d or less than 0", maxWorkerId));

}

if (datacenterId > maxDatacenterId || datacenterId < 0) {

throw new IllegalArgumentException(String.format("datacenter Id can't be greater than %d or less than 0", maxDatacenterId));

}

this.workerId = workerId;

this.datacenterId = datacenterId;

}

public synchronized long nextId() {

long timestamp = timeGen();

if (timestamp < lastTimestamp) {

throw new RuntimeException(String.format("Clock moved backwards. Refusing to generate id for %d milliseconds", lastTimestamp – timestamp));

}

if (lastTimestamp == timestamp) {

sequence = (sequence + 1) & sequenceMask;

if (sequence == 0) {

timestamp = tilNextMillis(lastTimestamp);

}

} else {

sequence = 0L;

}

lastTimestamp = timestamp;

return ((timestamp – twepoch) << timestampLeftShift) | (datacenterId << datacenterIdShift) | (workerId << workerIdShift) | sequence;

}

private long tilNextMillis(long lastTimestamp) {

long timestamp = timeGen();

while (timestamp <= lastTimestamp) {

timestamp = timeGen();

}

return timestamp;

}

private long timeGen() {

return System.currentTimeMillis();

}

}

2. 数据库事务处理

解决方案:确保在生成订单号和插入订单信息到数据库时使用同一个事务,正确处理并发事务。

代码示例

java

public void createOrder(Order order) {

try {

// Start transaction

transactionManager.beginTransaction();

// Generate order number

long orderNumber = orderNumberGenerator.nextId();

// Insert order into database

order.setOrderNumber(orderNumber);

orderRepository.save(order);

// Commit transaction

transactionManager.commitTransaction();

} catch (Exception e) {

// Rollback transaction

transactionManager.rollbackTransaction();

throw e;

}

}

3. 系统负载

解决方案:优化系统架构,增加服务器资源,或者使用缓存机制来缓解系统压力。

代码示例

java

// Use a distributed cache like Redis to store generated order numbers

public long nextOrderNumber() {

// Check cache first

String orderNumber = cache.get("orderNumber");

if (orderNumber == null) {

// Generate and store in cache

orderNumber = String.valueOf(orderNumberGenerator.nextId());

cache.set("orderNumber", orderNumber);

}

return Long.parseLong(orderNumber);

}

通过以上分析和解决方案,我们可以有效地解决订单号重复的确保系统的稳定性和数据的一致性。

发表评论
暂无评论

还没有评论呢,快来抢沙发~